Well, Laura and I are on out here on the west coast (”going, going, back, back, to Cali, Cali”…), enjoying some post-Christmas fellowship with family and friends. This morning we were talking about the future of the (younger) Slavich family — what, where, when and all that jazz. It’s a stressful point, for me especially. Because my wife’s wonderful and awesome family lives in south Florida. And my wonderful and awesome family lives in northern California.
So, the question quickly becomes, where are we going to live?
Of course, it’s easy to say, “Where the Lord takes us.” That only, however, helps sometimes in an abstract sense, because the Lord is going to take us somewhere. Where? Is the question.
I’ve thought seriously about doctorate work at Southern, thereby delaying the inevitable “Where?” for another four years, staying in Louisville, and not having to choose a side (of the country). It’s amazing how cop-outs and escapes can manifest themselves when you get older — I realized this past week that the Ph.D. thing was just that — an escape from having to make a decision. The Lord, however, has been tugging at me. I’m not satisfied in the ivory halls of theological education. Sure, you can minister while in school. But it is not the same (at least for me).
We have been praying about ministry after December 2008, when I will, Lord willing, graduate. SBC ministry is likely, though not certain.
All of this is background to the main point of what I am wanting to say. While we were talking about all of this with my parents this morning, my dad made a point about my theological conviction. He is an elder at a Calvary Chapel (see the sidebar for a link). Calvary churches are fairly notoriously antagonistic to Calvinism. My dad (though not a Calvinist) chafes against this mentality within the denomination, partially because his son is a Calvinist and partially because he knows it isn’t healthy to be so vehemently against anything that is not outside the pale of orthodoxy.
He, however, had some advice for me.
“Don’t label yourself,” he said. “People get misconceptions about you when you identify yourself with a buzzword like ‘Calvinist’. They might think something completely different than you mean by it.”
I told him: “If someone who was interviewing me for a ministry position asked me, ‘Are you a Calvinist?’, I would say, ‘What do you mean by that?’” I told him that I don’t need the label so much. I think it is a helpful way to encapsulate my theology, but if it becomes unhelpful — or even untrue — then I would willingly get rid of it.
This goes against many SBC higher-ups’ recommendation. (See this post).
But I think my dad is right.
What do you think?

December 28, 2007 at 4:00 pm
To say, “I am a Calvinist” is useful in the sense that it assigns priority; that is, “I believe it is important to accept these tenets.” If you are unwilling to define yourself that way, then it should be because you don’t think it (monergism) is important.
At our church we have a similar situation. We have a largely non-Calvinist church with an increasingly Calvinist pastor. It can be frustrating. I think the problem those “denominational executives” are addressing is a real one: if you are planning to teach Calvinism, you should be honest about that, because otherwise people are going to be upset.
I think your “what do you mean by that” question would be a good one, though. But I would not downplay the tension. Meaning, if I was on a pastor selection committee I would not want to hire a pastor who was going to make monergism the cornerstone of their teaching and discipleship, and I would want to know up front.
Maybe it’s different outside of California, but most Christians I know have enough theological facility to understand what Calvinism means. You should be willing to accept the label if that’s what you’re going to teach.
December 29, 2007 at 1:28 pm
There are many misconceptions that come with these labels. Labels are obviously helpful to people because they allow for generalizations which are “easier” to deal with… but we all know they can be harmful since no one fits a label perfectly.
I think Jeff’s advice is helpful - specifically the “what do you mean by that?” quote because you will be playing with the same terms. It will allow for misconceptions to not be as big of an issue since you will have defined the terms. Especially since there are some things that could be associated with Calvinism that you may not believe - like some of the components of reformed/covenant theology that you may not hold like amillenialism and paedobaptism. Although they aren’t things that readily come to mind with calvinism it is possible to make that association based on “reformed/covenant” based theology. You never really know where a label would take someone in their mind of what they assume.
This is actually a very helpful post for me to think through since I may be in a similar situation in the near future… and by near I mean in like 4 years because I am going painfully slow through my degree program.
January 2, 2008 at 12:08 pm
I think that was great advice…oh wait…it was me!